What should be avoided in PRPA report writing to maintain professionalism?

Maintaining professionalism in PRPA report writing involves presenting information in a clear, objective, and factual manner. The correct choice emphasizes that informal language, personal opinions, and emotional bias should be avoided. This is crucial because professionalism requires a focus on facts and evidence rather than subjective viewpoints that can detract from the credibility of the report.

Using informal language can undermine the seriousness of the report and may not resonate well with the intended audience, which often expects a formal tone. Additionally, personal opinions and emotional bias can skew the content, leading to conclusions that are not based on data and objective analysis. In a professional report, the aim is to communicate findings and recommendations based solely on research and empirical evidence, ensuring that the document serves as a reliable source of information.

The other choices do not align with the goal of maintaining professionalism. For instance, while technical jargon and complex sentences may occasionally be necessary, overuse can hinder clarity. Short sentences providing minimal detail may lead to oversimplifying complex issues, while thorough research and in-depth analysis are actually fundamental to a professional report. Thus, avoiding informal language and personal biases is key to achieving a professional standard in PRPA report writing.